Let’s get this out of the way, can we..

If we are going to talk about who someone supported in the past and say that it’s relevant today to show their judgment and leadership abilities, that it will give us an idea of who they will bring with them to the white house, lets get it all out there and move on to things that really matter.

Barack has been criticized for his ’ties’ with ACORN. Yes, he did defend them once and yes he did donate money to a subsidiary of theirs. Like Drudge uses pictures to prove that Barack is going to steal your white women, the McCain campaign uses his ties to ACORN as proof that Barack will steal your vote.

Here he is sitting next to Florida Rep. Kendrick at an ACORN-sponsored February 2006 rally, in Miami.

Wait, that’s not Barack Obama… That’s John McCain. I guess the “Maverick” is there to repudiate them like he assures us he can do. I know a picture in this campaign isn’t worth a 1000 words, hell even video isn’t worth anything, but maybe a video will show us all how McCain is going to whip their you know whats…

oh.

Here’s the thing. This rally wasn’t 5 or 10 years ago, it was 2 years ago this week and John McCain wasn’t just there to say “Hi”. He wasn’t there to tell them that they were “destroying the fabric of democracy” and “perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country” he was the key note speaker that day. In fact he has been a great supporter of ACORN over the years.

Either his judgment was wrong 2 years ago, or it is wrong today. Either way John McCain was so much of a supporter of ACORN’s that he traveled to Miami to speak for them, and if association with them is bad judgment then not only does McCain have the same bad judgment, he’s also suffering from forgetfulness since he doesn’t remember this support. The forgetfulness can be explained by age, the bad judgment? Well according to Fox news when Obama does it, can not.

William Ayers.

The idea behind this one is to show that you should be afraid of the Arab Barack Obama because he pals around with terrorists. It doesn’t matter that Obama has denied or reasonably explained it away.

It doesn’t matter that the same republican family that asked Barack to be on the panel with Ayers is also throwing their political support behind McCain, not too mention all the money they have given to Republican, which McCain or any Republican has to yet to address or ‘repudiate’. What matters is Barack associated with a terrorist and that makes him scary and risky and his judgment unfit to be President.

He’s Pallin’ around with terrorists…

John McCain as recently as the 2nd debate was boastful of this accomplishment in helping the “freedom fighters” in Afghanistan repel the Russian, even using it as evidence that he is somehow, superior to Barack

MCCAIN: First of all, I won’t repeat the mistake that I regret enormously, and that is, after we were able to help the Afghan freedom fighters and drive the Russians out of Afghanistan, we basically washed our hands of the region.

Maybe the other lesson McCain shouldn’t have ignored is the fact that Osama Bin Laden helped to fund those Freedom Fighters that McCain was so pleased to have also helped. John McCain aided,encouraged, and praises the mujahideen, the group funded and aided by Bin Laden, efforts in Afghanistan and is sorry that he didn’t do more to help them.

I guess I shouldn’t look that far back in history and judge McCain. It was a different time back then and Osama Bin Laden was good when we aided him, but then he changed into the despicable man that attacked us is such a horrific way on September 11,2001. But if I can’t judge McCain because a good man can turn bad, why can’t a bad man like Ayers turn into a good, citizen of the year?

Speaking of 9/11. The country we went after in retaliation of that attack was lead by another despicable man, Saddam Hussein. You recognize that name don’t you? You should, the speakers at John McCain’s rallies have said it enough. Only they aren’t saying it to remind you of Saddam. No, they are just saying it because it’s Barack Obama’s middle name that’s all…

If Saddam was such a bad person, and we know he was, then by default anyone with his name should also be a bad person, right? The truth is I can’t quite get my head far enough up my ass to see your point, but lets’ go with it anyway.

They have the same name so they must be the same people or have the same values.

William Timmons, the Washington lobbyist who John McCain has named to head his presidential transition team, aided an influence effort on behalf of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to ease international sanctions against his regime.

Oops.

The two lobbyists who Timmons worked closely with over a five year period on the lobbying campaign later either pleaded guilty to or were convicted of federal criminal charges that they had acted as unregistered agents of Saddam Hussein’s government.

Umm, well.. You see my friends.. I know how to win this war.

Timmons’ activities occurred in the years following the first Gulf War, when Washington considered Iraq to be a rogue enemy state and a sponsor of terrorism. His dealings on behalf of the deceased Iraqi leader stand in stark contrast to the views his current employer held at the time.
John McCain strongly supported the 1991 military action against Iraq, and as recently as Sunday described Saddam Hussein as a one-time menace to the region who had “stated categorically that he would acquire weapons of mass destruction, and he would use them wherever he could.”

Ok, so what do we know. We know that having the same name as a terrorists makes you a terrorist. So what does mean when you hand pick the man who is going to lead your transition team, that by the way is the man who is going to help pick your personal if you are elected President of the United States. What does it mean when that man actually lobbied FOR the terrorist while he was considered a terrorist?

I guess McCain can deny it

But testimony and records made public during Park’s criminal trial, as well as other information uncovered during a United Nations investigation, suggest just the opposite. Virtually everything Timmons did while working on the lobbying campaign was within days conveyed by Vincent to either one or both of Saddam Hussein’s top aides, Tariq Aziz and Nizar Hamdoon. Vincent also testified that he almost always relayed input from the Iraqi aides back to Timmons.

But that just wouldn’t be truthful. Not that truth has mattered much to John McCain lately.

So now that we know that McCain is supported by the founder of the same terrorist panel that Obama served on with Ayers and that McCain is proud of his work with Osama Bin Laden and doesn’t much care that the man in charge of his transition team worked and lobbied for Saddam after the 1st gulf war when he was considered a rogue leader..can we either label McCain as a terrorist sympathizer or just move the fuck on to something that actually matters like I don’t know…. Whether Barack wears boxers or briefs? Because really, If he doesn’t take care of his boys then what kind of President will he be?